Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Enhanced Lightning Strike Protection using Vertically Oriented Carbon Fiber Melded with Conventional Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Composite and its Validation Through Damage Analysis

SUBHABRATA SAHA, NADIM S. HMEIDAT, CHANYEOP PARK, PRITESH YEOLE, SCOTT L.J. MILLEN, ADRIAN MURPHY, BRIAN KNOUFF, MERLIN THEODORE, UDAY VAIDYA, AHMED ARABI HASSEN, VLASTIMIL KUNC, VIPIN KUMAR

Abstract


Lightning strike protection (LSP) is one of the prime factors in aerospace and wind industries concerning safety, enhanced service life, and reduced downtime. To ensure better LSP, high electrical conductivity is required to dissipate the current, which is always a challenge for polymer composites due to the inherent insulating nature of the polymer matrix. Conventional carbon fiber-reinforced composites (CFRP) offer electrical conductivity in the planar direction while the vertical i.e. through-thickness conductivity still remains a challenge. Having been motivated by this fact, we have fabricated CFRP interleaved with vertically oriented CF (Z-fiber) for the lightning strike test (100 kA). A paint was applied to mimic the actual service condition of the composite laminates. We have prepared two Z-fiber composites: (a) Z-1 containing one Z-fiber layer on the top along with conventional CF layers and (b) Z-5 containing five interleaved Z-fiber layers and compared the properties with conventional CFRP (Z-0). Interestingly, even a single Z-fiber layer (Z-1) showed lower damage (visual damage diameter 22 mm) than Z-0 (visual damage diameter 26 mm). Z-5 displayed the lowest damage (visual damage diameter 16.7 mm), which was further confirmed by cross-sectional optical microscopy. Improved LSP was attributed to the higher through-thickness electrical  conductivity in the case of Z-5 (9 times with respect to Z-0) reflecting a lower electrical anisotropy for Z-fiber composites. The residual mechanical property after the lightning test was analyzed through the flexural test, and the retention of flexural strength and modulus was 66% and 86%, respectively for Z-5 showing a significant improvement in comparison to Z-0 (>40% for both).

 



DOI
10.12783/asc38/36521

Full Text:

PDF

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.